Most audiologists have experienced this moment: You complete a full assessment. The results are clear. The diagnosis is accurate. And yet… The patient still says: “But I’m still struggling.”
This is not a failure of audiology. It is a sign that we are sometimes working at the level of the test, instead of the level of the person.
An audiogram tells us about hearing thresholds as well as the type and degree of loss. But it does not tell us:
Hearing loss is not only an auditory condition — it is a functional and social condition (WHO, 2021).
Using an ICF-informed approach, we begin to ask different questions:
| Traditional Focus | Functional Focus |
|---|---|
| What is the threshold? | How does the patient function? |
| What is the diagnosis? | What is the impact on daily life? |
| What device is needed? | What outcome matters to the patient? |
1. Go beyond “Do you have difficulty hearing?”
Ask:
2. Listen for effort (not just audibility)
Patients often describe fatigue, frustration and withdrawal. This reflects increased listening effort, not just hearing loss (Hornsby, 2013).
3. Use simple functional measures
You don’t need complex tools to start:
4. Set outcome-based goals
Shift from: “We fitted hearing aids” to “You can now follow conversations at family dinners”
5. Close the loop
Always ask: “Has this improved your daily life?”
In resource-constrained environments we cannot afford care that does not translate into outcomes. Every interaction must create real value. Functional audiology improves patient satisfaction, supports adherence and enhances efficiency (Louw et al., 2018; WHO, 2021).
Tomorrow, change just one thing: Replace “Can you hear this sound?” with “Where in your life are you struggling most?” That single shift changes the entire consultation.
Audiology becomes more powerful when we move from measuring hearing to improving lives. That is where our true value lies.
Recognising Balance Awareness Month by exploring why audiology belongs at the centre of balance, mobility and fall prevention.
The most common misconception in hearing screening? That OAE and AABR are interchangeable. They are not. They answer different clinical questions, assess different parts of the auditory system, and should be used strategically, not interchangeably. Understanding this distinction is what separates basic screening from clinically effective screening programmes.
